Search thousands of Speaker's rulings with AI-powered precision.
October 6, 2005
The Speaker: Order, please. I am now prepared to rule on the point of order raised on Tuesday, September 27 by the hon. Member for Mississauga South concerning the admissibility of an amendment to...
The Speaker ruled an amendment to a motion was admissible as it was relevant and within the scope of the original motion, despite changing the proposed action from selling to leasing land.
October 6, 2005
The Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the question of privilege raised on Monday, September 26 by the hon. Member for Calgary East concerning the work of the Ethics Commissioner. I would like...
The Speaker found a prima facie question of privilege concerning the Ethics Commissioner's conduct under the new Conflict of Interest Code, referring the matter to a committee for review.
September 29, 2005
The Speaker: I have listened to the arguments presented by the Deputy Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and the Bloc Québécois House Leader. I greatly appreciate their assistance on...
The Speaker ruled an amendment out of order because it introduced new propositions beyond the scope of the original motion.
June 8, 2005
The Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the question of privilege raised on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 and on Thursday, June 2, 2005 by the hon. Member for Glengarry–Prescott–Russell concerning the...
Speaker rules that mass faxes and cybersquatting targeting MPs are serious grievances but not a prima facie breach of privilege as they do not prevent Members from performing their duties.
June 7, 2005
The Speaker: After Question Period yesterday several hon. Members rose on points of order related to the statement I had made before Question Period relating to the inquiry now undertaken by the...
The Speaker clarifies that his power to enforce a moratorium on comments during an Ethics Commissioner inquiry is limited to proceedings within the House and does not extend outside the Chamber.
May 19, 2005
The Speaker: I thank all hon. Members for their interventions on this point. The Chair very much appreciates support for the Standing Orders which the Chair is bound to enforce in the House....
The Speaker rules that questions to committee chairs must concern committee business, but the Chair will not enforce relevance on the answers provided.
April 20, 2005
The Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the question of privilege raised on Monday, April 4, [2005] [3], by the hon. Member for Glengarry–Prescott–Russell arising from a question by the hon....
The Speaker ruled that mentioning an unnamed Member is under criminal investigation does not meet the threshold for a prima facie question of privilege, but cautioned Members against such remarks.
March 21, 2005
The Speaker: I am now ready to rule with regard to issues affecting two private Members' bills, Bill C-331, the Ukrainian Canadian Restitution Act, and Bill C-333, the Chinese Canadian Recognition...
The Speaker ruled that a private member's bill mandating the creation of a museum requires a royal recommendation, while bills mandating negotiations for financial restitution do not, as negotiation does not constitute a direct appropriation of funds.
April 1, 2004
The Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on a point of order raised by the hon. Opposition House Leader earlier today concerning proceedings in the Standing Committee on Public Accounts. I would...
The Speaker ruled that he cannot intervene in a committee's decision-making process, including the release of in camera testimony, as committees are masters of their own proceedings until they report to the House.
March 22, 2004
The Speaker: I am ready to rule on the question of privilege raised on March 10 by the hon. Member for St. John's West concerning the format of the Main Estimates for 2004-05. I would like to...
The Speaker ruled that Main Estimates must reflect the government's current structure, not anticipated reorganizations, and thus found no breach of privilege.