Search thousands of Speaker's rulings with AI-powered precision.
November 5, 2009
The Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the question of privilege raised on October 27, 2009, by the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons regarding the disturbance in the public...
The Speaker dismissed a question of privilege alleging a Member's involvement in a gallery protest, reaffirming the parliamentary principle of accepting a Member's word.
March 24, 2009
The Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the question of privilege raised by the hon. Member for Malpeque on March 5, 2009, concerning information disseminated by the Department of Fisheries and...
The Speaker ruled that the partisan use of a departmental website did not meet the high threshold of a prima facie question of privilege as it did not directly obstruct the Member's parliamentary duties.
December 4, 2008
The Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the question of privilege raised by the hon. Member for Malpeque on November 27, 2008, concerning a letter that the hon. Parliamentary Secretary to the...
The Speaker ruled that a Parliamentary Secretary's use of franking privileges to influence an external election was not a prima facie breach of privilege because it did not obstruct any Member's parliamentary duties.
January 31, 2008
The Speaker: Before we turn to Government Orders, I have a ruling to give. I am now prepared to rule on the question of privilege raised on Tuesday, January 29, [2008] [3], by the hon. Member for...
The Speaker ruled that a department's practice of asking for an MP's party affiliation for information requests, while concerning, is not a breach of privilege as it occurs outside of parliamentary proceedings.
April 16, 2002
The Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the question of privilege raised on Monday, April 15, 2002 by the hon. Member for Sarnia–Lambton concerning the expert advisers hired by the Standing...
The Speaker ruled that a committee's decision to hire an expert adviser funded by a government department and the adviser's subsequent political comments are internal committee matters, not a breach of privilege.