Search thousands of Speaker's rulings with AI-powered precision.
February 13, 2024
The Deputy Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the point of order raised earlier today by the House leader of the official opposition. It concerns the admissibility of an amendment made to...
The Speaker ruled that an amendment to a programming motion could substantively alter the related bill because the motion itself eliminated all other opportunities to do so.
November 2, 2018
The Assistant Deputy Speaker: I thank the hon. Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship for his explanation and apology regarding the circumstances of his tabling the document entitled...
The Speaker accepted the Minister of Immigration's apology for releasing a report to the media before tabling it in the House, closing the Question of Privilege while cautioning the government on future disclosures.
November 21, 2006
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Andrew Scheer): There are 95 motions in amendment standing on the Notice Paper for the report stage of Bill C-24. Motions Nos. 1 to 3, 5, 9, 10, 12, 20, 21, 23, 24, 26, 27,...
The Speaker rules on the selection of 95 report stage amendments for Bill C-24, rejecting many based on established criteria and grouping the remainder for debate.
September 20, 2006
The Speaker: I thank the hon. Member for Windsor–Tecumseh for his very able argument in respect of this matter. Certainly I am not in any way suggesting that the matter is not a serious one and...
The Speaker denied a request for an emergency debate on the Maher Arar report, ruling its tabling was not a sudden emergency.
June 8, 2006
The Speaker: Order. I am now prepared to rule on the point of order raised on May 17, 2006, and again on May 19, 2006, by the hon. Member for Ottawa–Vanier concerning the tabling of the document...
The Speaker denied a point of order requiring the Prime Minister to table a document, accepting the government's claim that it was exempt due to national security concerns.
November 15, 2005
The Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the question of privilege raised on Wednesday, September 28, 2005, by the hon. Member for Delta–Richmond East concerning the reply to Question No. 151 on...
The Speaker ruled that the Chair cannot compel the government to answer a written question or judge its use of the sub judice convention, thus denying a prima facie question of privilege.
May 4, 2005
The Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the point of order raised on Wednesday, April 13, 2005 by the hon. Member for Edmonton–Sherwood Park concerning the tabling of a document during Question...
The Speaker ruled that parliamentary practice has evolved to allow Ministers to table documents at any time during a sitting, including during Question Period.
February 6, 2003
The Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the question of privilege raised by the hon. Member for Hochelaga–Maisonneuve on December 12, 2002, concerning the premature disclosure of the Report of...
The Speaker denied a question of privilege, finding no prima facie evidence that two specific members were the source of a leaked special committee report.
February 15, 2001
The Speaker: We have a situation here where a report, which was prepared by an Officer of the House of Commons, [4] a person who reports to the House of Commons directly, has obviously been given...
The Speaker deferred a ruling on a question of privilege regarding a leaked report, directing the matter to the appropriate committee for investigation first.
October 17, 2000
The Deputy Speaker: The Chair is ready to give a decision on the question of privilege raised earlier today by the honourable member for Pictou—Antigonish—Guysborough alleging interference with an...
The Speaker ruled that government interference with the Information Commissioner did not constitute a prima facie case of contempt because the Commissioner was still able to report his frustrations to Parliament.