Skip to content
Question of Privilege October 9, 2003

Third reading: Member requesting a reprint of a bill

Hon. Peter Milliken

Hon. Peter Milliken

Speaker of the House

Ruling Text

The Acting Speaker (Mr. Bélair): I will now give the ruling on the question of privilege raised by the hon. Member for Mississauga South on October 6. I thank the hon. Member for raising the question, as well as the hon. Member for Yellowhead for his comments. The hon. Member for Mississauga South argued that, in light of the complexity of the Bill and of the number of amendments which the House had adopted at report stage, Members required a reprint of the Bill in order to be able to properly conduct debate at third reading. He pointed out that this need was all the more pressing given that the Bill had not been debated since April 10 of this year. The unanimous consent of the House was sought on March 31 and again on October 3 to permit a motion ordering a reprint of the Bill to be put to a vote. The consent was denied. I would like to remind the hon. Member that it is not the practice of the House to have bills reprinted at third reading. In this regard I refer him to the ruling by the Deputy Speaker on the same point concerning Bill C-13 on March 31, at page 4922 of the Debates. As the hon. Member is fully aware, the House may, if it chooses, order a reprint of the Bill. The unanimous consent necessary to allow such a motion to be put without notice has so far not been forthcoming.. [1] Debates, October 6, 2003, pp. 8186-87. [2] Debates, March 31, 2003, p. 4920. [3] Debates, October 3, 2003, p. 8141.
Edit Metadata

AI Summary

The Speaker denied a question of privilege requesting a reprint of a bill for third reading, affirming it is not standard practice and requires unanimous consent.

AI Analysis

Holding
"The Chair cannot order a reprint of a bill at third reading stage, as this is not standard practice and requires a motion passed with unanimous consent, which was not granted."
Outcome
Denied
Tone
Educational
Procedural Stage
Third Reading
Significance
Low High

Cited Authorities