Ruling
February 9, 2004
Leave refused: softwood lumber: matter deemed not of sufficient urgency and another opportunity for debate available
Hon. Peter Milliken
Speaker of the House
Ruling Text
The Speaker:
The Chair has listened carefully to the comments of the hon. Member for Sackville–Musquodoboit Valley–Eastern Shore. I note that this issue is one that has continued for some many months and is not new. I am concerned about allowing an emergency debate when there is no new development that might have prompted an additional concern or emergency at this particular time.
While I have no doubt that the subject is one of considerable interest and importance, I note that the House is involved at the moment in the debate on the Address in Reply to the Speech from the Throne, which allows great latitude to all hon. Members in their speeches. I am sure the hon. Member will want to participate in that debate and possibly raise this subject then, with other hon. Members responding. I would encourage him to pursue that avenue at this time.
Of course we will continue to monitor the situation. Should circumstances change once the debate on all subjects in regard to the Speech from the Throne is over, perhaps the hon. Member will want to renew his request, or something else may have transpired which will make it one that in the view of the Chair would be worthy of an emergency debate. In the circumstances, I am not disposed to grant the request at this time..
[1]
Debates, February 9, 2004, p. 322.
Edit Metadata
Holding
"The request for an emergency debate is denied as the matter is not new and an alternative opportunity for debate is currently available."
AI Summary
The Speaker denied a request for an emergency debate, citing a lack of urgency and the availability of the ongoing Throne Speech debate as an alternative forum.
AI Analysis
- Outcome
- Denied
- Tone
- Conciliatory
- Procedural Stage
- Debate on the Address in Reply
- Significance
Low
High