Statement
April 24, 2001
Chair's statement: guidelines for the conduct of take-note debates
Hon. Peter Milliken
Speaker of the House
Ruling Text
Skip to main content
Parliament of Canada
Visit Parliament
Visit
Français
FR
Share
Email
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Menu
Parliamentary Business
Parliamentary Business - Home
The House
Sitting Calendar
House Publications
Bills (LEGIS
info
)
Written Questions
Petitions
Votes
Search the Debates (Hansard)
Status of House Business
Committees
List of Committees and Overview
Meetings
Bills in Committee (LEGIS
info
)
Studies, Activities and Reports
Search the Transcripts
Participate
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Legislative Summaries
Research Publications
Parliamentary Historical Resources
(1867-1993)
Parliamentary Diplomacy
Parliamentary Diplomacy - Home
Speakers' Activities
Parliamentary Associations
Visits and Events
Conferences
Parliamentary Officers' Study Program
Members
Members - Home
Members and Roles
Members of Parliament
The Speaker
Ministry (Cabinet)
Parliamentary Secretaries
Party Leaders and other House Officers
Related Information
Party Standings
Seating Plan
Members' Expenditures
Registry of Designated Travellers
A Member's Typical Week
Resources
Contact Members of Parliament
Constituencies
Library of Parliament
Historical Information (PARLINFO)
Participate
Participate - Home
The House
Attend Live Debates
Watch and Listen to Chamber Proceedings
Create or Sign a Petition
A Typical Week at the House
Contact a Member of Parliament
Follow a Bill (LEGIS
info
)
Committees
Attend Meetings
Watch and Listen to Committee Proceedings
Current Consultations
How to Submit a Brief and Appear
Layout of a Typical Committee Room
Contact a Committee
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Classroom Activities
Teacher Resources
Teachers Institute
About the House
About the House - Home
Transparency and accountability
Board of Internal Economy
By-Laws and Policies
Members' Allowances and Services
House Administration
Reports and Disclosure
Conflict of Interest Code for Members
Accessibility
Arts and Heritage
History, Art and Architecture
Future of the Parliamentary Precinct
Memorial Chamber
Carillon
In pictures
Virtual Tour of the House
Live Hill Cam
Photo Gallery
Employment
Employment - Home
Working for the administration
Current Opportunities at the House of Commons
Eligibility and Selection
General Application
Who We Are and What We Offer
Student Opportunities
Student Employment
Page Program
Parliamentary Internship Programme
Working for a Member of Parliament
Current Listed Opportunities Working for a Member of Parliament
Search
Search
Search
Search Source
Full website
Member
Bill
Topic
Petition
Writen Question
Parliamentary Business
Parliamentary Business - Home
The House
Sitting Calendar
House Publications
Bills (LEGIS
info
)
Written Questions
Petitions
Votes
Search the Debates (Hansard)
Status of House Business
Committees
List of Committees and Overview
Meetings
Bills in Committee (LEGIS
info
)
Studies, Activities and Reports
Search the Transcripts
Participate
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Legislative Summaries
Research Publications
Parliamentary Historical Resources
(1867-1993)
Parliamentary Diplomacy
Parliamentary Diplomacy - Home
Speakers' Activities
Parliamentary Associations
Visits and Events
Conferences
Parliamentary Officers' Study Program
Members
Members - Home
Members and Roles
Members of Parliament
The Speaker
Ministry (Cabinet)
Parliamentary Secretaries
Party Leaders and other House Officers
Related Information
Party Standings
Seating Plan
Members' Expenditures
Registry of Designated Travellers
A Member's Typical Week
Resources
Contact Members of Parliament
Constituencies
Library of Parliament
Historical Information (PARLINFO)
Participate
Participate - Home
The House
Attend Live Debates
Watch and Listen to Chamber Proceedings
Create or Sign a Petition
A Typical Week at the House
Contact a Member of Parliament
Follow a Bill (LEGIS
info
)
Committees
Attend Meetings
Watch and Listen to Committee Proceedings
Current Consultations
How to Submit a Brief and Appear
Layout of a Typical Committee Room
Contact a Committee
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Classroom Activities
Teacher Resources
Teachers Institute
About the House
About the House - Home
Transparency and accountability
Board of Internal Economy
By-Laws and Policies
Members' Allowances and Services
House Administration
Reports and Disclosure
Conflict of Interest Code for Members
Accessibility
Arts and Heritage
History, Art and Architecture
Future of the Parliamentary Precinct
Memorial Chamber
Carillon
In pictures
Virtual Tour of the House
Live Hill Cam
Photo Gallery
Employment
Employment - Home
Working for the administration
Current Opportunities at the House of Commons
Eligibility and Selection
General Application
Who We Are and What We Offer
Student Opportunities
Student Employment
Page Program
Parliamentary Internship Programme
Working for a Member of Parliament
Current Listed Opportunities Working for a Member of Parliament
Search
Search
Search
Search Source
Full website
Member
Bill
Topic
Petition
Writen Question
Search all ProceduralInfo
Overview
Procedure and Practice
Standing Orders
Speakers' Decisions
Our Procedure
Glossary
Selected Decisions of Speaker Peter Milliken
2001 - 2011
Selected Decisions
Peter Milliken
Special Debates
Take-note Debates
Table of Contents
Previous
Next
Special Debates / Take-note Debates
Chair’s statement: guidelines for the conduct of take-note debates
April 24, 2001
Debates,
p. 3089
Context
On April 24, 2001, pursuant to an Order made on Monday, April 23, 2001,
[1]
the House resolved itself into a Committee of the Whole to consider a motion standing on the Order paper in the name of Don Boudria (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) on the state of Canada’s resource industries (Government Business No. 5).
[2]
Since this was the first time the House had undertaken a take-note debate under the rules governing Committees of the Whole, the Chair of Committees of the Whole (Bob Kilger) opened the debate with brief remarks as to how it would be conducted.
Statement of the Chair
The Chairman:
Order, please. The House in Committee of the Whole on Government Business No. 5.
Before I call the debate and because we are endeavouring into uncharted waters, I will make a few opening remarks as to how this debate will be conducted.
While there have been take-note debates in the House on many previous occasions, tonight we are dealing with a slightly different situation.
The motion under which we are meeting provides that the debate will be conducted under our Standing Orders for Committees of the Whole, namely, that no Member shall speak for more than 20 minutes with no period of questions and comments. Second, that Members may speak more than once. Third, that Members need not to be in their own seat to be recognized. That is why we see our hon. friend from Brandon–Souris so close to the Chair this evening.
That being said, I understand this format has been chosen to create a more informal atmosphere that will promote genuine dialogue among Members on this issue. In that sense I believe we are embarking on something of an experiment.
As your Chair, I must be guided by the rules of the Committee of the Whole. However, if Members, and only if Members agree, I would be prepared to exercise discretion and flexibility in the application of these rules. That way I hope all participants can make good use of their time and take full advantage of the availability and accessibility of Ministers.
With the cooperation of all Members, I hope we may all learn some valuable lessons tonight about how this type of debate can best be conducted, so as to be a productive forum for exploring issues of public policy.
I look forward to your cooperation. Myself and other occupants during the debate will demonstrate the flexibility that hopefully will allow us to create a forum of discussion on public policy that will be attractive to Members on both sides of the House and if not more important to all Canadians.
Postscript
On June 1, 2001, the Special Committee on the Modernization and Improvement of the Procedures of the House presented its Report recommending, in part, the adoption of a Standing Order governing take-note debates.
[3]
The Report also recommended that the new Standing Order provide for take-note debates to be held in a Committee of the Whole format. The new Standing Order (53.1), which encompassed many of the provisions usually adopted by Special Order prior to a take-note debate, such as limits on the length of speeches and of the debate, and allowing the Speaker to preside over the Committee, came into effect with the adoption by the House of the Report of the Special Committee on October 4, 2001.
[4]
Some third-party websites may not be compatible with assistive technologies. Should you require assistance with the accessibility of documents found therein, please contact
accessible@parl.gc.ca
.
[1]
Debates, April 23, 2001,
pp. 2973-4
, Journals,
p. 308
.
[2]
Debates, April 24, 2001,
p. 3087
.
[3]
Journals, June 1, 2001,
p. 465
.
[4]
Journals, October 4, 2001,
pp. 691-3
.
For questions about parliamentary procedure, contact the Table Research Branch
613-996-3611
trbdrb@parl.gc.ca
Top of page
Senate
Library of Parliament
Parliamentary Protective Service
Employment at Parliament
Follow Us
Important Notices
Open Data
Info for Media
Site Map
Accessibility
Contact Us
Edit Metadata
Holding
"In take-note debates, interventions must be relevant to the motion's subject matter, and the 10-minute period for questions and comments must be used for that purpose, not for making new speeches."
AI Summary
The Speaker sets guidelines for take-note debates, emphasizing that rules of relevance and decorum, especially during questions and comments, will be enforced.
AI Analysis
- Outcome
- Other
- Tone
- Educational
- Procedural Stage
- Government Orders
- Significance
Low
High