Skip to content
Statement November 18, 2004

Establishment of first Order of Precedence: Speaker's statement regarding royal recommendation

Hon. Peter Milliken

Hon. Peter Milliken

Speaker of the House

Ruling Text

Skip to main content Parliament of Canada Visit Parliament Visit Français FR Share Email Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Menu Parliamentary Business Parliamentary Business - Home The House Sitting Calendar House Publications Bills (LEGIS info ) Written Questions Petitions Votes Search the Debates (Hansard) Status of House Business Committees List of Committees and Overview Meetings Bills in Committee (LEGIS info ) Studies, Activities and Reports Search the Transcripts Participate Resources Procedural Information Library of Parliament Legislative Summaries Research Publications Parliamentary Historical Resources (1867-1993) Parliamentary Diplomacy Parliamentary Diplomacy - Home Speakers' Activities Parliamentary Associations Visits and Events Conferences Parliamentary Officers' Study Program Members Members - Home Members and Roles Members of Parliament The Speaker Ministry (Cabinet) Parliamentary Secretaries Party Leaders and other House Officers Related Information Party Standings Seating Plan Members' Expenditures Registry of Designated Travellers A Member's Typical Week Resources Contact Members of Parliament Constituencies Library of Parliament Historical Information (PARLINFO) Participate Participate - Home The House Attend Live Debates Watch and Listen to Chamber Proceedings Create or Sign a Petition A Typical Week at the House Contact a Member of Parliament Follow a Bill (LEGIS info ) Committees Attend Meetings Watch and Listen to Committee Proceedings Current Consultations How to Submit a Brief and Appear Layout of a Typical Committee Room Contact a Committee Resources Procedural Information Library of Parliament Classroom Activities Teacher Resources Teachers Institute About the House About the House - Home Transparency and accountability Board of Internal Economy By-Laws and Policies Members' Allowances and Services House Administration Reports and Disclosure Conflict of Interest Code for Members Accessibility Arts and Heritage History, Art and Architecture Future of the Parliamentary Precinct Memorial Chamber Carillon In pictures Virtual Tour of the House Live Hill Cam Photo Gallery Employment Employment - Home Working for the administration Current Opportunities at the House of Commons Eligibility and Selection General Application Who We Are and What We Offer Student Opportunities Student Employment Page Program Parliamentary Internship Programme Working for a Member of Parliament Current Listed Opportunities Working for a Member of Parliament Search Search Search Search Source Full website Member Bill Topic Petition Writen Question Parliamentary Business Parliamentary Business - Home The House Sitting Calendar House Publications Bills (LEGIS info ) Written Questions Petitions Votes Search the Debates (Hansard) Status of House Business Committees List of Committees and Overview Meetings Bills in Committee (LEGIS info ) Studies, Activities and Reports Search the Transcripts Participate Resources Procedural Information Library of Parliament Legislative Summaries Research Publications Parliamentary Historical Resources (1867-1993) Parliamentary Diplomacy Parliamentary Diplomacy - Home Speakers' Activities Parliamentary Associations Visits and Events Conferences Parliamentary Officers' Study Program Members Members - Home Members and Roles Members of Parliament The Speaker Ministry (Cabinet) Parliamentary Secretaries Party Leaders and other House Officers Related Information Party Standings Seating Plan Members' Expenditures Registry of Designated Travellers A Member's Typical Week Resources Contact Members of Parliament Constituencies Library of Parliament Historical Information (PARLINFO) Participate Participate - Home The House Attend Live Debates Watch and Listen to Chamber Proceedings Create or Sign a Petition A Typical Week at the House Contact a Member of Parliament Follow a Bill (LEGIS info ) Committees Attend Meetings Watch and Listen to Committee Proceedings Current Consultations How to Submit a Brief and Appear Layout of a Typical Committee Room Contact a Committee Resources Procedural Information Library of Parliament Classroom Activities Teacher Resources Teachers Institute About the House About the House - Home Transparency and accountability Board of Internal Economy By-Laws and Policies Members' Allowances and Services House Administration Reports and Disclosure Conflict of Interest Code for Members Accessibility Arts and Heritage History, Art and Architecture Future of the Parliamentary Precinct Memorial Chamber Carillon In pictures Virtual Tour of the House Live Hill Cam Photo Gallery Employment Employment - Home Working for the administration Current Opportunities at the House of Commons Eligibility and Selection General Application Who We Are and What We Offer Student Opportunities Student Employment Page Program Parliamentary Internship Programme Working for a Member of Parliament Current Listed Opportunities Working for a Member of Parliament Search Search Search Search Source Full website Member Bill Topic Petition Writen Question Search all ProceduralInfo Overview Procedure and Practice Standing Orders Speakers' Decisions Our Procedure Glossary Selected Decisions of Speaker Peter Milliken 2001 - 2011 Selected Decisions Peter Milliken Private Members’ Business Financial Limitation Table of Contents Previous Next Private Members’ Business / Financial Limitation Establishment of first Order of Precedence: Speaker’s statement regarding royal recommendation November 18, 2004 Debates, pp. 1553-4 Context On October 29, 2004, the House concurred in the Twelfth Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs. This had the effect of extending, until the last sitting day of June 2005, the provisional Standing Orders relating to Private Members’ Business, adopted by the House on March 17, 2003, and subsequently amended on February 16, 2004, and October 20, 2004. In addition, Standing Orders 68(4)( b ) and 68(7)( b ) (whereby a private Member and not only a Minister of the Crown could present a motion to have a committee prepare and bring in a bill) were to remain suspended for the same period. [1] On November 18, 2004, to mark the establishment of the first complete Order of Precedence in the Thirty-Eighth Parliament, the Speaker made a statement with respect to the provisional Standing Orders on Private Members’ Business. He explained that all items of Private Members’ Business would be votable unless specifically designated as non-votable. The Speaker also reminded Members that any bill authorizing the expenditure of public funds required a royal recommendation, which can only be transmitted to the House by a Minister of the Crown, before the question could be put for third reading. He added that bills proposing to impose or increase taxes require ways and means motions and may not be introduced by private Members. Thus, bills requiring ways and means motions would be identified early and would not be placed on the Order of Precedence. Statement of the Chair The Speaker: I wish to make a statement to the House regarding Private Members’ Business. Members will recall that on October 29, 2004, the House concurred in the Twelfth Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs concerning the provisional Standing Orders on Private Members’ Business. The effect of that Report is to continue the provisional Standing Orders concerning Private Members’ Business until the last sitting day in June 2005. The complete Order of Precedence for Private Members’ Business was published this morning in the Order Paper. The provisional Standing Orders provide that Private Members’ Business will not operate on a sessional basis. That is to say that proceedings on Private Members’ Business originating in the House will not expire on prorogation, and that the Order of Precedence will continue from one session to the next. It is therefore very important that Members be clear on the workings of the provisional Standing Orders, as they may not have a second opportunity to present an item even should the House be prorogued. Members should also note that unless specifically designated as non-votable, all Private Members’ Business items will be votable. I would like in particular to draw to the attention of Members the possibility that a proposed private Members’ bill may require a royal recommendation or a ways and means motion. First of all, I wish to address the royal recommendation. Any bill which authorizes the spending of public funds or effects an appropriation of public funds must be accompanied by a message from the Governor General, recommending the expenditure to the House. This message, known formally as the royal recommendation, can only be transmitted to the House by a Minister of the Crown. House of Commons Procedure and Practice , page 710 states: In 1994, the Standing Orders were again amended to remove the requirement that a royal recommendation had to be provided to the House before a bill could be introduced. The royal recommendation can now be provided after the bill has been introduced in the House, as long as it is done before the bill is read a third time and passed… The royal recommendation accompanying a bill must still be printed in the Notice Paper , printed in or annexed to the bill and recorded in the Journals. With respect to private Members’ bills, it is stated on pages 711 and 712: —since the rule change of 1994, private Members’ bills involving the spending of public money have been allowed to be introduced and to proceed through the legislative process, on the assumption that a royal recommendation would be submitted by a Minister of the Crown before the bill was to be read a third time and passed. If a royal recommendation were not produced by the time the House was ready to decide on the motion for third reading of the bill, the Speaker would have to stop the proceedings and rule the bill out of order. The Speaker has the duty and responsibility to ensure that the Standing Orders on the royal recommendation as well as the constitutional requirements are upheld. Where it seems likely that a bill may need a royal recommendation, the Member who has requested to have it drafted will be informed of that fact by the Legislative Counsel responsible for drafting the bill. Members may wish to consult with Legislative Counsel or with Private Members’ Business Office to obtain further advice with respect to individual cases. It remains my duty as Speaker to make the final decision concerning the need for a royal recommendation. I remain open to hear the submissions of hon. Members from both sides of the House who may wish to assist the Chair in reaching a decision on particular bills. As the House has not yet begun to debate items of Private Members’ Business, I felt that it would be of assistance to alert hon. Members to the important impact that the requirement for a royal recommendation may have on their bills. The Standing Orders leave no doubt that the House cannot be asked to decide on the motion for the third reading of a bill requiring the expenditure of public funds unless proper notice of a royal recommendation has been given. Should Members have any concerns about the provisions of individual bills in this regard, it would be prudent for them to raise such concerns well before the third reading stage is reached. With regard to ways and means, any bill which imposes or increases a tax on the public must be preceded by the adoption of a motion of ways and means. Such a motion can only be proposed by a Minister of the Crown. As House of Commons Procedure and Practice states at pages 758 and 759: The House must first adopt a ways and means motion before a bill which imposes a tax or other charge on the taxpayer can be introduced… Before taxation legislation can be read a first time, a notice of a ways and means motion must first be tabled in the House by a Minister of the Crown— Furthermore, it goes on, at page 898, to state: With respect to the raising of revenue, a private Member cannot introduce bills which impose taxes. The power to initiate taxation rests solely with the government and any legislation which seeks an increase in taxation must be preceded by a ways and means motion. A Member who has requested to have a bill drafted that proposes the imposition or increase of taxation will be so advised by the Legislative Counsel responsible for drafting the bill. Members may wish to consult with Legislative Counsel or with [the] [2] Private Members’ Business Office to obtain further advice with respect to individual cases. The Standing Orders are more restrictive with regard to ways and means bills. The Speaker will identify such bills at an early stage to prevent them from being placed on the Order of Precedence. I have made this statement as part of my responsibility to ensure the orderly conduct of Private Members’ Business. If Members should have specific questions on a particular item, I would invite them to contact the Private Members’ Business Office. I would like to inform the House that under the provisions of Standing Order 88, at least two weeks shall elapse between the first and second reading of private Members’ public bills. The second reading of Bill C-333, standing as the first item on the Order of Precedence in the name of the hon. Member for Durham, could only have been considered on or after Monday, November 29, 2004. The debate at second reading of the Bill can therefore not take place as scheduled tomorrow. Accordingly, I am directing the Table Officers to drop that item of business to the bottom of the Order of Precedence in the Order paper. Private Members’ Hour will thus be cancelled and the House will proceed with the business before it prior to Private Members’ Hour tomorrow. Postscript In its Twelfth Report, presented to the House and concurred in on October 29, 2004, [3] the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs charged the Subcommittee on Private Members’ Business with reviewing the provisional Standing Orders. The Subcommittee reported on its review in its Second Report, adopted by the Committee on May 10, 2005. [4] It observed that there appeared to be a significant degree of satisfaction with the provisional Standing Orders, that no major problems had been identified, and that they had redressed many of the concerns and complaints that had been previously expressed by Members. The Subcommittee noted that the “vast majority” of Members were in favour of the new regime: 48% of the 103 Members who responded to a survey on the new regime felt that the changes should be permanently adopted, and another 27% wished to see them continue, albeit still provisionally. The Subcommittee recommended, therefore, the permanent adoption of the rules. The Standing Committee agreed with the Subcommittee’s recommendation and reported it to the House, which concurred in the Committee’s Thirty-Seventh Report on May 11, 2005. [5] Accordingly, the provisional Standing Orders were adopted as permanent, effective June 30, 2005. Editor’s Note See similar statements to mark the publication of the first complete Order of Precedence of the Thirty-Ninth Parliament on May 31, 2006, and of the Fortieth Parliament on February 25, 2009. Some third-party websites may not be compatible with assistive technologies. Should you require assistance with the accessibility of documents found therein, please contact accessible@parl.gc.ca . [1] Debates, October 29, 2004, pp. 959-60 . [2] The word “the” is missing from the published Debates. [3] Twelfth Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented to the House and concurred in on October 29, 2004 (Journals, pp. 170-1 ). [4] Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, Minutes of Proceedings, May 10, 2005, Meeting No. 34 . [5] Journals, May 11, 2005, pp. 738-9 . For questions about parliamentary procedure, contact the Table Research Branch 613-996-3611 trbdrb@parl.gc.ca Top of page Senate Library of Parliament Parliamentary Protective Service Employment at Parliament Follow Us Important Notices Open Data Info for Media Site Map Accessibility Contact Us
Edit Metadata

AI Summary

The Speaker clarifies that Private Members' Bills requiring a royal recommendation cannot be included in the Order of Precedence until the recommendation is provided.

AI Analysis

Holding
"Private Members' Bills that require a royal recommendation are not eligible to be included in the draw to establish the Order of Precedence."
Outcome
Other
Tone
Educational
Procedural Stage
Routine Proceedings
Significance
Low High

Cited Authorities

  • House of Commons Procedure and Practice (1st)