Précédent.ai

Mr. Speaker: The issue was first raised by the honourable Member for Ottawa South and raised immediately and properly with the Chair on the question of "deliberately misrepresent." There is no doubt in my mind that "deliberately misrepresent" is unparliamentary. The question of "mislead" or "misrepresent" may or may not be unparliamentary, depending on the context in which it is used. If it is an argument over facts, that goes on in this place all the time. If it is said, and it may well have been, in the matter that the honourable Member quotes, it may have been said in a context in which the accusation was a very severe one indeed. That is why I caution honourable Members not to just look in Beauchesne to see what words have, at one time or another, been ruled as unparliamentary, but to remember that it also has to be considered in the context. In this case, I understand the honourable Member, who is a conscientious Member in this place, wanting to establish that he did not make this statement carelessly. If the honourable Minister has a view about it which is different than his own, that is a matter of debate. However, the honourable Member has said that he feels that he made that in good faith. The honourable Minister has withdrawn any suggestion that there was any deliberateness on the part of the honourable Member and I think that that is where the matter must end. A gain, it is an example of how careful we do have to be, even in debate, and even in the rough and tumble of exchanges in this place. F0720-e 34-2 1990-09-28. [1] Debates, September 28, 1990, p. 13567. [2] Debates, September 28, 1990, p. 13576.

Unparliamentary language: expression "misrepresent"

Ruling Text

AI Summary

AI Analysis

AI Keywords

Cited Authorities

Tags & Keywords