Skip to content
Ruling May 3, 1966

Subamendment; distinct questionLe 3 mai 1966

Hon. Lucien Lamoureux

Hon. Lucien Lamoureux

Speaker of the House

Ruling Text

The subamendment is not relevant to the amendment; it raises a distinct question which can be considered only on a motion after notice.
Edit Metadata

AI Summary

A 1966 ruling established that a subamendment is out of order if it is not relevant to the main amendment and introduces a new, distinct question.

AI Analysis

Holding
"A subamendment is out of order if it is not relevant to the amendment and introduces a distinct question."
Outcome
Denied
Tone
Neutral
Procedural Stage
Debate on a Motion
Significance
Low High

Cited Authorities

Tags & Keywords