Skip to content
Statement June 27, 1986

Government response, effects of prorogation

Hon. John Bosley

Hon. John Bosley

Speaker of the House

Ruling Text

By virtue of the Standing Orders, the House has made a continuing order for the return of requested responses and has further ordered that such an order for return should survive prorogation. Furthermore, the same reasoning can be applied in respect of responses to petitions, which by practice are tabled in the House.. Sources cited Standing Orders 99(2), 106(8), 121. Beauchesne, 5th ed., p. 150, c. 412. Abraham and Hawtrey's Parliamentary Dictionary, 3rd ed. (London, 1970), p. 186. References Debates, June 26, 1986, p. 14870.
Edit Metadata

AI Summary

This ruling clarifies that government obligations to respond to orders for return and petitions are not cancelled by parliamentary prorogation.

AI Analysis

Holding
"The government's obligation to provide responses to both orders for return and petitions is not extinguished by the prorogation of a session of Parliament."
Outcome
Other
Tone
Educational
Procedural Stage
Not specified
Significance
Low High