Ruling
October 28, 1985
Continuing after adjournment
Hon. John Bosley
Speaker of the House
Ruling Text
The report that brought in the proposal for questions and comments makes it clear that the intention of the ten-minute period is to allow a back and forth exchange between the person who made the speech and those who wish to put forward questions and comments after it. When debate has been adjourned for a normal period of time, it does not seem sensible to allow the questions and comments to continue in the unavoidable absence of the Member who spoke. Following comments the Speaker pointed out that this should not be interpreted to mean that the question-and-comment period can be obviated by a Member making a speech and then immediately leaving the Chamber..
Sources cited Special Committee on Standing Orders and Procedure, Third Report, November 5, 1982, p. 7:16.
Edit Metadata
Holding
"The questions and comments period following a speech cannot continue after a debate has been adjourned if the Member who spoke is absent."
AI Summary
This ruling clarifies that the questions and comments period cannot proceed after an adjournment if the original speaker is absent, as its purpose is direct exchange.
AI Analysis
- Outcome
- Other
- Tone
- Educational
- Procedural Stage
- Debate
- Significance
Low
High
Cited Authorities
- Special Committee on Standing Orders and Procedure, Third Report (November 5, 1982, p. 7:16)