Skip to content
Other February 10, 1984

Amendment to refer subject matter of motion to committee

Hon. Lloyd Francis

Hon. Lloyd Francis

Speaker of the House

Ruling Text

<div class="DecisionMain" role="main"> <p class="decision-chapter">Amendments and Subamendments to Motions / Miscellaneous</p> <div> </div> <p class="d-DecisionDate"> <time>February 10, 1984</time> </p> <p class="e-Debates">Debate <a href="https://parl.canadiana.ca/view/oop.debates_HOC3202_02/121?r=0&amp;s=1">p. 1295</a></p> <div> <h2 class="f-ContextResoEdNotePostscriptTitle">Background</h2> </div> <p class="g-ContextResoEdNotePostscript">During debate on the Private Members' motion in the name of Mr. Hawkes (Calgary West) concerning the reimbursement of legal fees of any individual for his defence against action commenced by the Crown, Mr. Nickerson (Western Arctic) proposed an amendment to refer the subject matter of the motion to the Standing Committee on Regulations and Other Statutory Instruments. The Deputy Speaker ruled on the admissibility of the amendment immediately.</p> <h2 class="f-ContextResoEdNotePostscriptTitle">Issue</h2> <p class="g-contextResoEdNotePostscript">Is an amendment to refer the subject matter of a motion to committee in order?</p> <h2 class="f-ContextResoEdNotePostscriptTitle">Decision</h2> <p class="g-contextResoEdNotePostscript">No. The amendment is not in order.</p> <h2 class="f-ContextResoEdNotePostscriptTitle">Reasons given by the Deputy Speaker</h2> <p class="g-contextResoEdNotePostscript">Such an amendment would be acceptable for a bill at second reading. “May I draw the attention of Hon. Member to Beauchesne's Fifth Edition, Citation 435(1) which provides 'It is not an amendment to a motion that the question' ... or subject matter in this instance - 'go to a committee.’" When a similar situation arose in 1926 the Speaker at that time rule d the motion out of order for this same reason.</p> <h2 class="f-ContextResoEdNotePostscriptTitle">Sources cited</h2> <p class="g-contextResoEdNotePostscript">Beauchesne, 5th ed., p. 154, c. 435(1).</p> <h2 class="f-ContextResoEdNotePostscriptTitle">References</h2> <p class="g-contextResoEdNotePostscript">Debates, March 22, 1926, p. 1806; February 10, 1984, <a href="https://parl.canadiana.ca/view/oop.debates_HOC3202_02/115?r=0&amp;s=1">pp. 1289-94</a>.</p> </div>
Edit Metadata

AI Summary

The provided text is a description of a procedural action, not a Speaker's Ruling.

AI Analysis

Holding
"The provided text is not a Speaker's Ruling and therefore contains no holding."
Outcome
-
Tone
-
Significance
Low High

Cited Authorities

Tags & Keywords