Other
May 16, 1983
Length of debate; second reading; eight-hour rule
Hon. Jeanne Sauvé
Speaker of the House
Ruling Text
<div class="DecisionMain" role="main">
<p class="decision-chapter">
Rules of Debate / Miscellaneous
</p>
<p class="d-DecisionDate">
<time>May 16, 1983</time>
</p>
<p class="e-Debates">Debates <a href="https://parl.canadiana.ca/view/oop.debates_HOC3201_22/723?r=0&s=1">p. 25477</a></p>
<div>
<h2 class="f-ContextResoEdNotePostscriptTitle">Background</h2>
</div>
<p class="g-contextResoEdNotePostscript">On May 13, during the second reading of Bill C-155, An Act to facilitate transportation, shipping and handling of western grain and to amend certain acts in consequence thereof, Mr. Benjamin (Regina West) raised a point of order contending that the ten minutes reserved for questions and comments following a Member's speech should not be taken into account when calculating the eight hours of consideration of a bill at second reading. After hearing Member's comments, the Acting Speaker (Mr. Blaker) took the matter under consideration and the Deputy Speaker ruled at the next sitting.</p>
<h2 class="f-ContextResoEdNotePostscriptTitle">Issue</h2>
<p class="g-contextResoEdNotePostscript">Is the ten-minute period reserved for questions and comments following a Member's speech included in the calculation of the eight hours of second reading.</p>
<h2 class="f-ContextResoEdNotePostscriptTitle">Decision</h2>
<p class="g-contextResoEdNotePostscript">Yes. The ten-minute period reserved for questions and comments is included in the calculation of the eight hours.</p>
<h2 class="f-ContextResoEdNotePostscriptTitle">Reasons given by the Deputy Speaker</h2>
<p class="g-contextResoEdNotePostscript">The practice developed since the beginning of the year confirms the interpretation given to the provisional Standing Orders and the intent of the Third Report of the Special Committee on Standing Orders and Procedure to the effect that the ten-minute period reserved for questions and comments following a Member's speech has always been included in determining the eight-hour period.</p>
<h2 class="f-ContextResoEdNotePostscriptTitle">Sources cited</h2>
<p class="g-contextResoEdNotePostscript">Special Committee on Standing Orders and Procedure, Third Report, November 5, 1982, Issue No. 7, pp. 16-7.</p>
<p class="g-contextResoEdNotePostscript">Standing Order 35(2).</p>
<h2 class="f-ContextResoEdNotePostscriptTitle">References</h2>
<p class="g-contextResoEdNotePostscript">Debates, May 13, 1983, <a href="https://parl.canadiana.ca/view/oop.debates_HOC3201_22/709">pp. 25463-5</a>.</p>
</div>
Edit Metadata
Holding
"The provided text is a title only and does not contain a ruling."
AI Summary
Analysis based on a title regarding the eight-hour rule for debate at second reading; no ruling text was provided.
AI Analysis
- Outcome
- Other
- Tone
- Neutral
- Procedural Stage
- Debate on Second Reading
- Significance
Low
High