Skip to content
Point of Order March 5, 1976

Motions in amendment, beyond scope of bill

Hon. James Jerome

Hon. James Jerome

Speaker of the House

Ruling Text

<div class="DecisionMain" role="main"> <p class="decision-chapter">Amendments to the Content of Bills / Report Stage</p> <p class="d-DecisionDate"> <time>March 5, 1976</time> </p> <p class="e-Debates">Journals <a href="https://parl.canadiana.ca/view/oop.HOC_3001_121_02/322">p.1090</a></p> <p class="e-Debates">Debates <a href="https://parl.canadiana.ca/view/oop.debates_HOC3001_11/606?r=0&amp;s=1">p. 11556</a></p> <div> <h2 class="f-ContextResoEdNotePostscriptTitle">Background</h2> </div> <p class="g-contextResoEdNotePostscript">During consideration of the report stage of Bill C-61, an Act to provide a maritime code for Canada, a point of order was raised by Mr. Forrestall (Dartmouth—Halifax East) seeking the decision of the Acting Speaker (Mr. Turner) on the acceptability of a particular motion in amendment which had the affect of amending another statute, the Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act.</p> <h2 class="f-ContextResoEdNotePostscriptTitle">Issue</h2> <p class="g-contextResoEdNotePostscript">Can an amendment seek to amend a statute which is not presently before the House?</p> <h2 class="f-ContextResoEdNotePostscriptTitle">Decision</h2> <p class="g-contextResoEdNotePostscript">The amendment is out of order.</p> <h2 class="f-ContextResoEdNotePostscriptTitle">Reasons given by the Acting Speaker</h2> <p class="g-contextResoEdNotePostscript">The amendment goes beyond the scope of the bill.</p> <h2 class="f-ContextResoEdNotePostscriptTitle">Authority cited</h2> <p class="g-contextResoEdNotePostscript">Beauchesne, 4th ed., p. 285, c. 406.</p> </div>
Edit Metadata

AI Summary

A ruling on the procedural admissibility of a legislative amendment based on whether it is within the established scope of the parent bill.

AI Analysis

Holding
"Amendments that are irrelevant to the bill, go beyond its scope by introducing a new principle, or attempt to amend a law not currently under consideration are procedurally out of order."
Outcome
Other
Tone
Neutral
Procedural Stage
Government Orders
Significance
Low High

Cited Authorities

Tags & Keywords