Skip to content
Point of Order January 25, 1973

Rule of anticipation

Hon. Lucien Lamoureux

Hon. Lucien Lamoureux

Speaker of the House

Ruling Text

In applying the rule of anticipation, recognition must be given to what can be considered a descending scale of values; that is, bills, motions and amendments. The estimate has not really come before the House and no decision has been made except to send it to a committee for study. "The bill has, however, been given first reading and the House is now considering whether it should have second reading... [T]he bill before the House is the more effective form of proceeding in relation to the estimate which is now being considered. Bill C-124 would give a statutory basis and the estimate would be a consequential proceeding."
Edit Metadata

AI Summary

Speaker clarifies that the rule of anticipation does not block debate on a bill when a related, but less effective, estimate is in committee.

AI Analysis

Holding
"The rule of anticipation does not prevent debate on a bill when a related estimate is before a committee, because a bill is a higher-value, more effective proceeding."
Outcome
Denied
Tone
Educational
Procedural Stage
Government Orders
Significance
Low High

Cited Authorities

Tags & Keywords