Skip to content
Ruling February 17, 1970

Setting a condition; proposing a referendum

Hon. Lucien Lamoureux

Hon. Lucien Lamoureux

Speaker of the House

Ruling Text

The proposed amendment does not oppose the principle of the bill, but rather attaches a condition to the motion for second reading of the bill. It is therefore not essentially a reasoned amendment.
Edit Metadata

AI Summary

The Speaker ruled an amendment inadmissible because it attached a condition to a bill's second reading instead of opposing its principle, failing the test for a reasoned amendment.

AI Analysis

Holding
"An amendment to a second reading motion is not a valid reasoned amendment if it merely attaches a condition, such as a referendum, rather than opposing the principle of the bill."
Outcome
Denied
Tone
Neutral
Procedural Stage
Government Orders
Significance
Low High

Cited Authorities

Tags & Keywords