Skip to content
Point of Order July 8, 1969

Committee report; Standing Orders

Hon. Lucien Lamoureux

Hon. Lucien Lamoureux

Speaker of the House

Ruling Text

The point of order raised is not so much a point of order as a point of debate. "... it is not the responsibility of the Chair to rule on questions of law or on constitutional questions." If the Member believes that his argument is founded on a constitutional point, he can put it before the House in the course of the debate.
Edit Metadata

AI Summary

The Speaker ruled that a point of order concerning a constitutional question was a matter for debate, not a procedural ruling for the Chair.

AI Analysis

Holding
"Arguments based on constitutional or legal grounds are matters for debate and not valid points of order for the Chair to rule upon."
Outcome
Denied
Tone
Educational
Procedural Stage
Debate
Significance
Low High

Cited Authorities