Search thousands of Speaker's rulings with AI-powered precision.
March 15, 2010
The Deputy Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the point of order raised by the hon. Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, concerning the requirement...
The Speaker ruled that a Private Member's Bill revoking charitable status for high-paying organizations did not require a Ways and Means motion as it did not create a new class of taxpayer.
February 25, 2009
Skip to main content Parliament of Canada Visit Parliament Visit Français FR Share Email Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Menu Parliamentary Business Parliamentary Business - Home The House Sitting...
The Speaker clarifies that a private member's bill requiring a royal recommendation cannot be added to the Order of Precedence until the recommendation is received.
December 1, 2008
The Speaker: Before continuing, I would like to inform the House of the Speaker's opinion of the amendment proposed by the hon. Member for Joliette. I must indicate that I have given consideration...
The Speaker ruled an amendment inadmissible because changing a motion's intent from 'take note of' to 'condemns' contradicts the original motion.
March 13, 2008
The Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the point of order raised by the hon. Member for Pickering–Scarborough East on March 11 concerning the admissibility of the ways and means motion to...
The Speaker ruled that a government Ways and Means motion is admissible even if it seeks to amend or repeal a Private Member's Bill passed in the same session.
November 28, 2007
The Speaker: Before we proceed to Orders of the Day, I wish to give a ruling on a matter before the House. Members will recall that on October 16, 2007, the Chair made a statement reminding...
The Speaker ruled a private member's bill null and void because it imposed a tax without the required Ways and Means motion, which can only be initiated by a Minister.
March 29, 2007
The Speaker: I am now ready to give a ruling that everybody has been waiting a week for on the point of order raised on Wednesday, March 21, 2007 by the hon. Government House Leader alleging the...
The Speaker ruled an opposition supply day motion out of order for attempting to force the passage of multiple government bills, affirming this usurps the government's prerogative to control the legislative agenda.
March 22, 2004
The Speaker: I am ready to rule on the question of privilege raised on March 10 by the hon. Member for St. John's West concerning the format of the Main Estimates for 2004-05. I would like to...
The Speaker ruled that Main Estimates must reflect the government's current structure, not anticipated reorganizations, and thus found no breach of privilege.
October 29, 2003
The Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the point of order raised by the hon. Member for Kootenay–Columbia concerning whether Bill S-7, the Heritage Lighthouses Preservation Bill, violates the...
The Speaker ruled that a Senate bill concerning heritage lighthouses did not require a royal recommendation as it did not directly compel the expenditure of public funds.
February 17, 2003
The Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the question of privilege raised on February 12, 2003, by the hon. Member for Sarnia–Lambton concerning management of the Canadian Firearms Program. I...
The Speaker ruled that withdrawing supplementary estimates for the firearms program did not cancel its original funding, so no privilege was breached by the Minister's continued spending.
October 31, 2002
The Speaker: First, the Chair wants to thank all hon. Members for their assistance on this important issue. I want to say first that yesterday the Government House Leader raised a point of order...
The Speaker ruled that an opposition supply day motion is admissible, finding that the British 'rule of anticipation' is not strictly applied in the Canadian House of Commons.