Search thousands of Speaker's rulings with AI-powered precision.
March 27, 2001
The Speaker: The Chair is quite prepared to rule on this issue immediately. I refer the hon. Member for Burnaby–Douglas to Marleau and Montpetit, as he has done, at page 426: —In summary, when...
The Speaker ruled a question out of order because it sought a minister's opinion on another member's actions, which is outside the government's administrative responsibility.
March 20, 2001
The Speaker: Order, please. This is not a "Statement by Ministers". We are ready to move to Private Members' Business and while it is always in order for a Minister to table a document, I must say...
The Speaker ruled that a Minister's attempt to make a statement while tabling a document was out of order and directed the House to proceed to the next item of business.
May 29, 2000
The Deputy Speaker: As the honourable member for Témiscamingue pointed out, the Standing Orders are fairly clear on this point. I refer to Standing Order 36(2)(f), which states: 36. (2) In order...
The Chair ruled that electronic petitions are not permissible as Standing Order 36(2)(f) requires original, physical signatures.
April 14, 2000
The Deputy Speaker: The Chair is ready to at least say something on this subject. It is a matter of some concern to the Chair, not just because of the point raised today but because there have...
The Chair cautioned members to avoid statements of a commercial nature during S.O. 31s but declined to rule on whether a specific fundraising announcement had violated the rules.
February 8, 1999
The Speaker: I am ready to make a ruling on the point of order raised on December 8, 1998, by the honourable member for Delta—South Richmond concerning questions on the Order Paper. First of all I...
The Speaker ruled that the Clerk can divide complex written questions and that the Chair cannot enforce response deadlines or judge the factual content of government answers.
October 5, 1998
The Deputy Speaker: The Chair is mindful of the comments and thanks honourable members on every side for their very useful contributions on this point. I may say that the citation from Beauchesne...
The Speaker ruled that a potentially improper question was rendered moot because it was answered to the satisfaction of the House.
June 9, 1998
The Speaker: The House leader for the Conservative Party makes a very interesting point as does the opposition House leader. I point out to the House that it would be one thing to go with the...
The Speaker allowed a motion under S.O. 56.1 to proceed, despite it potentially exceeding the rule's scope, by citing recent, unopposed precedents for similar motions.
May 27, 1998
The Speaker: Of course I want to listen to any question of privilege and I do listen attentively. From what I heard today this is a dispute of the facts. We have an honourable member saying he put...
The Speaker ruled that a dispute over the factual content of an answer to an Order Paper question is not a prima facie question of privilege.
April 7, 1997
The Speaker: I wish to make a very brief statement that has to do with the Question Period. Recently, we had questions about guidelines for the Speaker during oral question Period. More...
The Speaker announces that questions anticipating an order of the day are now permissible during Question Period, following a committee recommendation.
November 29, 1996
The Speaker: Dear colleagues, before proceeding with Statements by Members, I would like to return to the question raised yesterday by the honourable member for Laurier—Sainte-Marie following the...
The Speaker rules that while the Chair does not judge the truth of statements, members must avoid personal attacks during Statements by Members under Standing Order 31.