Search thousands of Speaker's rulings with AI-powered precision.
June 20, 2005
The Speaker: Before we resume debate on second reading of Bill S-14, An Act to protect Heritage Lighthouses, I would like to deliver a ruling on the point of order raised by the Chief Government...
The Speaker ruled that a bill to protect heritage lighthouses does not require a royal recommendation as potential costs are operational and not a new spending authority.
May 4, 2005
The Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the point of order raised on Wednesday, April 13, 2005 by the hon. Member for Edmonton–Sherwood Park concerning the tabling of a document during Question...
The Speaker ruled that parliamentary practice has evolved to allow Ministers to table documents at any time during a sitting, including during Question Period.
October 24, 2003
The Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the point of order raised on October 2, 2003, by the hon. Member for St. Albert, concerning his claim that the Office of the Privacy Commissioner had...
The Speaker denied a point of order concerning departmental overspending, ruling that no procedural breach occurred as the matter would be handled by established financial reporting laws.
March 29, 2001
The Speaker: Ten motions in amendment are listed in the Notice Paper at the report stage of Bill C-2. Motions Nos. 1 to 3 and 5 to 7 cannot be proposed to the House because they are not...
The Speaker rules several amendments to Bill C-2 out of order for lacking a Royal Recommendation and establishes a new procedural standard to limit amendments at report stage.
June 22, 1992
Mr. Speaker: The honourable Member for Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte some days ago, also the honourable Member for Nanaimo-Cowichan (Mr. David Stupich), and subsequently 40 other Members have...
The Speaker granted an emergency debate on the northern cod fishery but adjusted the start time to 10 p.m. to resolve conflicts with existing House orders on extended sitting hours and time allocation.
December 5, 1991
The Deputy Speaker: I have a difficulty right now because our rules say that I should not have accepted a point of order in the midst of the adjournment motion. This is the adjournment motion,...
The Deputy Speaker ruled that points of order are inadmissible during Adjournment Proceedings, citing established precedent regarding the timing of interventions during the late show.
January 29, 1990
Mr. Speaker: There is agreement in the House, I understand, that I render a judgment now on a point of order raised by the honourable Member for Kamloops a few days ago rather than wait until the...
The Speaker ruled that a Ways and Means motion referencing a non-tabled document is procedurally acceptable, allowing the related tax bill to proceed.
December 18, 1989
The Speaker: On November 20, 1989 the honourable Member for Kingston and the Islands raised a question of privilege related to certain pamphlets on the Goods and Services Tax which a constituent...
A ruling that accepted a Minister's explanation for the continued circulation of pre-ruling GST pamphlets, thereby settling a question of privilege on the matter.
December 21, 1988
The Chair of Committees of the Whole: I am now ready to rule on the point of order raised by a number of Members. In the point of order raised earlier today, the honourable Member for Kingston and...
The Chair ruled that a closure motion in Committee of the Whole can apply to clauses of a bill that have not yet been debated, based on historical precedents.
June 29, 1987
Mr. Speaker: On Friday last, just before the House adjourned, the honourable Deputy Prime Minister (Hon. Don Mazankowski) renewed notice of his intention to move a motion under Standing Order 57...
The Speaker ruled that he has no discretion to prevent the government from using a closure motion as it is a valid procedural tool explicitly provided for in the Standing Orders.