Search thousands of Speaker's rulings with AI-powered precision.
February 8, 1993
The Speaker: The honourable member for Parkdale—High Park has raised a matter which has been raised before in this House. There is a rule as the honourable member referred to it and read it to the...
Speaker acknowledges the government's breach of rules regarding petition response times but notes the Chair lacks sanction power, resolving the immediate issue via a government undertaking.
December 9, 1992
The Speaker: I know that the House would want me to respond to the honourable Member for Kamloops and the honourable Member for Cape Breton—East Richmond (Mr. David Dingwall) and the honourable...
The Speaker denied a challenge to a time allocation motion, ruling that the government had strictly adhered to the current rules despite opposition claims of unfairness or lack of consent.
November 20, 1992
The Deputy Speaker: As far as Question No. 283 is concerned, our rules do provide for such a procedure. It is agreed and so ordered. Postscript The debate on the subject matter of the question...
The Deputy Speaker granted the request to transfer the subject matter of Order Paper Question No. 283 to the Adjournment Proceedings debate, confirming the procedure is allowed under the rules.
June 11, 1992
The Speaker: Before proceeding to the daily routine of business, I want to give my ruling on a matter raised by the honourable Member for Calgary Northeast a few days ago. As all honourable...
The Speaker ruled that broken pairing agreements are private matters beyond the intervention of the Chair or the House because current Standing Orders provide no mechanism for penalty or correction.
June 4, 1992
Mr. Speaker: Perhaps I can assist the House. I have listened very carefully to interventions from both colleagues who have been in this place a long time. First of all, I have ruled that the...
The Speaker rules the word 'traitor' is unparliamentary and compels the offending Member to withdraw the remark under threat of discipline.
April 1, 1992
The Speaker: On Monday, March 30, 1992, the honourable Member for Cape Breton—East Richmond rose on a point of order relating to the omnibus nature of Bill C-63, An Act to dissolve or terminate...
The Speaker denied a Point of Order challenging the procedural admissibility of an omnibus bill (Bill C-63) on the grounds that established Canadian parliamentary practice permits such bills, and the Chair lacks authority to order their division.
February 12, 1992
The Speaker: I promised yesterday that I would return with respect to a question which was put by the honourable Member for Ottawa—Vanier yesterday, a question on a subject that is of course very...
The Speaker ruled that a question demanding the Prime Minister instruct a government appointee to retract comments was out of order for being argumentative and outside the scope of government administrative competence.
February 6, 1992
Mr. Speaker: I have listened very carefully to the matter raised by the honourable Member for Cape Breton—East Richmond, commented upon by the honourable Member for Kamloops and the honourable...
The Speaker addressed the interpretation of the 'emergency' requirement for emergency debates, stating that the Chair is bound by the strict definition until the House formally amends the Standing Order.
February 5, 1992
The Speaker: I have a judgment to give on a question of privilege. I would like to advise all honourable Members that I am now ready to rule on a question of privilege raised on Monday the 3rd of...
The Speaker deferred a question of privilege regarding the late tabling of an Order in Council, ruling that the relevant standing committee must first investigate and report on whether contempt of the House had occurred.
December 5, 1991
The Deputy Speaker: I have a difficulty right now because our rules say that I should not have accepted a point of order in the midst of the adjournment motion. This is the adjournment motion,...
The Deputy Speaker ruled that points of order are inadmissible during Adjournment Proceedings, citing established precedent regarding the timing of interventions during the late show.