Search thousands of Speaker's rulings with AI-powered precision.
July 15, 1980
The documents submitted by the Member do not clearly indicate inaccuracies. Furthermore, even if they were shown to be incorrect, falsified or altered, which they have not, there is no indication...
The Speaker denied a question of privilege, finding no evidence of intent to deceive the House and ruling the matter did not pertain to parliamentary duties.
June 6, 1980
Questions Related to Content of Bills / Miscellaneous June 6, 1980 Journals pp. 244-5 Debates pp. 1862-3 Background During the period set aside for consideration of Private Members' Business, Mr....
The provided text is a title or concept related to the financial initiative of the Crown, not a complete Speaker's Ruling.
April 17, 1980
The Prime Minister may table the letter if he wishes, but there is no obligation upon him to do so because it involves a letter which he did not actually quote but to which he merely referred.
A Speaker's ruling clarifies that a document only needs to be tabled if it is quoted from, not if it is merely referenced.
October 24, 1979
The Chair finds it difficult to see that the issue constitutes a genuine emergency as required under Standing Order 26 for it involves a decision which was made by a regularly constituted board,...
The Speaker denied an emergency debate on a VIA Rail decision, ruling that actions by regulatory boards are not urgent matters for debate.
October 23, 1979
Amendments to Motions on Progress of Bills / Second Reading October 23, 1979 Journals p. 100 Debates pp. 537-9 Background During debate at second reading on Bill C-10, an Act to provide for...
The provided text 'Second reading' is a procedural heading indicating a stage of debate on a bill, not a Speaker's ruling.
October 11, 1979
The Speaker: On June 1, 1994, the honourable member for Winnipeg—Transcona raised a point of order concerning the designation of party status for members of the New Democratic Party. I would like...
The Speaker ruled that the House, not the Chair, must decide on granting official party status, but used his discretion to seat the NDP caucus together on the seating plan.
February 13, 1979
Motions without Notice Proposed under Standing Order 43 / Application of the Rule February 13, 1979 Debates, pp. 3164-6 Background On October 26, 1978, Mr. Hnatyshyn (Saskatoon—Biggar) rose on a...
The provided text 'Application of the rule' is too short and incomplete to be analyzed as a Speaker's Ruling.
December 19, 1978
Of the five motions, three of them (Motions 11, 27 and 30) "clearly seek to amend the parent Act in a way that was not envisaged by the amending bill." Another motion (No. 12) "is defective in...
A Speaker's ruling declares five motions out of order for procedural defects related to amending a parent act, combining clauses, and specifying a coming-into-force date.
November 13, 1978
The matter must be more than simply urgency of consideration: there must be an element of genuine emergency. "[A] transaction which... appears to be within the normal orbit of the purpose for...
The Speaker denied a request for an emergency debate, ruling the issue was not a genuine emergency and other opportunities for debate were available.
November 9, 1978
The complaint was raised at the earliest opportunity. The letter from the Solicitor General to Mr. Lawrence can be considered a proceeding in Parliament for the purpose of privilege. A contempt...
The Speaker found a prima facie case of contempt, ruling that a minister's letter is a proceeding in Parliament and the sub judice convention does not apply to a Royal Commission.