Search thousands of Speaker's rulings with AI-powered precision.
May 15, 2014
The Deputy Speaker: I think we are all aware of the general policies that we have followed in this House for a long period of time on the use of props and also [on] wearing pins and other...
The Speaker denied a point of order against wearing pins, ruling they were not disruptive as no prior complaint had been made, but warned they would be banned if they caused disorder.
March 6, 2014
The Deputy Speaker: With regard to the point of order, I am not ruling against it, but I would like to quote from O'Brien and Bosc, page 667, under "Notice". This is what is required when one of...
The Speaker ruled that the Chair does not assess the quality of consultation for time allocation, only that the government has formally declared that no agreement was reached.
June 18, 2012
The Speaker: As the Deputy Speaker promised the House when she initially ruled on this matter, I am now prepared to rule substantively on the point of order raised by the hon. Member for Winnipeg...
The Speaker ruled that for time allocation motions, a 'sitting day' is defined as the weekly average of hours for Government Orders, not the length of a specific day.
June 22, 2011
The Deputy Speaker: I am now prepared to give a ruling on a point of order raised yesterday by the hon. Member for Toronto Centre regarding a statement made by the Minister of Public Safety in the...
The Speaker ruled that a Minister's words were unparliamentary but closed the matter after the Minister provided a clarification.
March 15, 2010
The Deputy Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the point of order raised by the hon. Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, concerning the requirement...
The Speaker ruled that a Private Member's Bill revoking charitable status for high-paying organizations did not require a Ways and Means motion as it did not create a new class of taxpayer.
March 5, 2010
The Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the question of privilege raised on March 18, 2010, by the hon. Member for Scarborough–Rouge River, the hon. Member for St. John's East and the hon....
Speaker rules the government's refusal to provide uncensored documents on Afghan detainees as ordered by the House is a prima facie question of privilege, affirming Parliament's absolute power to demand information.
December 1, 2008
The Speaker: Before continuing, I would like to inform the House of the Speaker's opinion of the amendment proposed by the hon. Member for Joliette. I must indicate that I have given consideration...
The Speaker ruled an amendment inadmissible because changing a motion's intent from 'take note of' to 'condemns' contradicts the original motion.
May 12, 2008
The Speaker: There are four motions in amendment standing on the Notice Paper for the report stage of Bill C-377, An Act to ensure Canada assumes its responsibilities in preventing dangerous...
The Speaker ruled that amendments not considered in committee due to a procedural impasse were selectable for debate at report stage under exceptional circumstances.
May 6, 2008
The Speaker: Order, please. I am now ready to rule on the point of order raised by the hon. Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Natural Resources and for the Canadian Wheat Board regarding...
The Speaker rules that several report stage motions to delete clauses from Bill C-5 are admissible as they do not infringe on the royal recommendation.
April 10, 2008
The Speaker: The Chair has notice of a question of privilege from the hon. Member for Charlottetown. Hon. Shawn Murphy (Charlottetown, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, on February 12 of this year, I, on behalf...
The Speaker found a prima facie case of contempt based on a unanimous committee report that a witness provided false testimony to the committee.