Search thousands of Speaker's rulings with AI-powered precision.
March 8, 1990
Mr. Speaker: On Monday, March 5, 1990, the honourable Member for Kamloops rose on a point of order to suggest that the debate on the budget be suspended and that the Chair review the Government...
The Speaker rules that the sub judice convention does not apply to bills, thereby allowing debate on government legislation to proceed despite a related matter being before the courts.
February 20, 1990
Mr. Speaker: This morning the honourable Member for Kamloops raised a point of order concerning the budget presentation which will be delivered later this day. He wished to obtain clarification as...
The Speaker ruled that the 10-minute Questions and Comments period does not apply to the budget speech, based on established House practice.
November 7, 1989
Mr. Speaker: The Chair would ask the indulgence of the House to render a decision on the matter raised yesterday by the honourable Member for York Centre relating to the Sub Judice convention. I...
The Speaker denied a request to ask questions about a matter before the courts, ruling that the sub judice convention applied because the issue was part of an active defense motion in a criminal trial.
October 10, 1989
The Speaker: I am now ready to rule on the question of privilege which was raised on September 25 by the right honourable Leader of the Opposition concerning the government advertisements which...
The Speaker ruled that a government advertisement for the GST was not a prima facie contempt of Parliament but strongly warned against repeating such actions.
April 27, 1989
Mr. Speaker: On April 19, 1989, an Order was made by this House. It was a unanimous order as a consequence of discussions as so often happens here between Leaders of all three Parties. That...
The Speaker ruled that a formal House Order made by unanimous consent is binding and cannot be unilaterally set aside by the Chair, even if the parties who gave consent later attempt to withdraw it due to a budget leak.
June 30, 1987
The Speaker: I am now ready to rule on the question of privilege raised on Friday, June 19, by the honourable Member for Saint-Jacques. The basis of the honourable Member's complaint is his...
The Speaker ruled that a White Paper accompanied by a Ways and Means motion is not necessarily a Budget and found no prima facie breach of privilege for misleading the House.
June 18, 1987
Mr. Speaker: I am now prepared to rule on the question of privilege raised yesterday by the Rt. Hon. Leader of the Opposition concerning the principle of secrecy as it relates to fiscal matters....
The Speaker ruled that providing outside experts with advance access to a fiscal White Paper does not constitute a breach of privilege as it does not obstruct Members' duties.
December 9, 1986
The Speaker: I shall now deal with the matter raised by the honourable Member for Kamloops—Shuswap on November 21. I would first like to express my appreciation of the great care with which the...
The Speaker denied a question of privilege regarding an alleged bill leak, ruling there was insufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case.
May 23, 1985
Precedence and Sequence of Business / Superseding Motion May 23, 1985 Debates p. 4984 Background On May 13, 1985, the House passed a special order for consideration of a Ways and Means motion for...
The Speaker ruled that a motion to adjourn is inadmissible during a Budget presentation when a special order of the House is in effect.
February 23, 1984
Rules of Debate - Order and Decorum / Relevance February 23, 1984 Debates p. 1691 Background During debate on the Budget presented by Mr. Lalonde (Minister of Finance), at the end of the...
A ruling affirming that the questions and comments period following a speech must remain relevant to the content of that speech.